Welfare Reform in New Hampshire

General Information

View a brief abstract of this project.

View a complete, printer-friendly profile of this project.

Evaluator(s) University of New Hampshire
Investigator(s) Raelene Shippee-Rice (University of New Hampshire)
Michele Solloway (University of New Hampshire)
Robert McGrath (University of New Hampshire)
 
Domain Income Security/TANF
Status Operational with Findings
Type Research and/or Program Evaluation
Policy Analysis
Program/Policy Description

The New Hampshire TANF program stresses a “work-first” concept of assistance, where employment is seen as preferential to welfare and as providing a means for individuals and families to raise their income level and escape poverty. In New Hampshire the TANF program is two distinctive programs: the NH Employment Program (NHEP) and the Family Assistance Program (FAP). The NHEP consists of all clients able to work, and represents the majority of clients. The FAP consists of cases in which no able-bodied adult is receiving assistance. In some child-only cases, a parent is present in the household but is not a TANF recipient because the parent is receiving Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits, State Supplement, SSA or VA disability benefits, is an ineligible noncitizen, or is sanctioned. These cases are commonly referred to as child-only cases. There are also non-parental child-only cases in which the child is living with a caretaker relative.

This study examines the implementation of the New Hampshire TANF program as it has changed the nature and culture of assistance benefits specific to clients, staff and the state's employers. Findings from this evaluation have begun to answer a number of research questions about the NHEP program development; caseload and client characteristics; trends in program participation; implementation and staff and client cultural change; client experiences with employment and earnings; clients’ obstacles and barriers to employment; and “best practices.”

Notes No notes reported.
 
Last Updated 12/10/04
Type of Summary Unreviewed
Contact(s) Michele Solloway
University of New Hampshire
Submitter(s) Research Forum Staff (info@researchforum.org)
National Center for Children In Poverty
215 West 125th St, 3rd Fl
(T) (646)284-9600
(F) not reported

Populations Studied

Target Population Recipients/participants/clients
Local government
Subgroups Analyzed None
Sample Size and Unit n=30 Staff Survey;
n= 230 Client self-administered survey;
n= 141 Client telephone survey;
n= 37 Employers.

TANF clients, Employers, Staff Members, Current recipients, Long-term recipients, Entrants, Exiters, Leavers

Execution Response Rates

Staff survey: 83%;

Overall response rate for Client surveys: 59%;
The low response rate can be explained in part by the large number of telephone numbers that could never produce a completed survey, but that required a large number of calls over several days or weeks before they could be eliminated.

Employer survey: 37%.
Employer surveys typically have response rates of 20-25%.

Sites Studied

New Hampshire